4.8 Article

Fine Tuning of Fluorene-Based Dye Structures for High-Efficiency p-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 10614-10622

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5022396

关键词

p-type dye-sensitized solar cells; organic sensitizer; fluorene; charge recombination; NiO

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2011CBA00703]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2014TS016]
  3. Council on Faculty Research, Eastern Illinois University
  4. Swinburne University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on an experimental study of three organic push-pull dyes (coded as zzx-op1, zzx-op1-2, and zzx-op1-3) featuring one, two, and three fluorene units as spacers between donors and acceptors for p-type dye-sensitized solar cells (p-DSSC). The results show increasing the number of spacer units leads to obvious increases of the absorption intensity between 300 nm and 420 nm, a subtle increase in hole driving force, and almost the same hole injection rate from dyes to NiO nanoparticles. Under optimized conditions, the zzx-op1-2 dye with two fluorene spacer units outperforms other two dyes in p-DSSC. It exhibits an unprecedented photocurrent density of 7.57 mA cm(-2) under full sun illumination (simulated AM 1.5G light illumination, 100 mW cm(-2)) when the I-/I-3(-) redox couple and commercial NiO nanoparticles were used as an electrolyte and a semiconductor, respectively. The cells exhibited excellent long-term stability. Theoretical calculations, impedance spectroscopy, and transient photovoltage decay measurements reveal that the zzx-op1-2 exhibits lower photocurrent losses, longer hole lifetime, and higher photogenerated hole density than zzx-op1 and zzx-op1-3. A dye packing model was proposed to reveal the impact of dye aggregation on the overall photovoltaic performance. Our results suggest that the structural engineering of organic dyes is important to enhance the photovoltaic performance of p-DSSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据