4.8 Article

Corrosion-Controlling and Osteo-Compatible Mg Ion-Integrated Phytic Acid (Mg-PA) Coating on Magnesium Substrate for Biodegradable Implants Application

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 22, 页码 19531-19543

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am506741d

关键词

biodegradable metals; bone implants; magnesium; osteo-biocompatibility; phytic acid; corrosion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473138, 20973134, 81330031]
  2. Key Basic Research Program of China [2011CB606204]
  3. Sichuan Youth Science & Technology Foundation [2012JQ0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biodegradable, a new revolutionary concept, is shaping the future design of biomedical implants that need to serve only as a temporary scaffold. Magnesium appears to be the most promising biodegradable metal, but challenges remain in its corrosion-controlling and uncertain biocompatibility. In this work, we employ chemical conversion and alternating dip-coating methods to anchor and deposit an Mg ion-integrated phytic acid (Mg-PA) coating on Mg, which is supposed to function both corrosion-controlling and osteo-compatible. It was ascertained that PA molecules were covalently immobilized on a chemically converted Mg(OH)(2) base layer, and more PA molecules were deposited subsequently via chelating reactions with the help of additive Mg ions. The covalent immobilization and the Mg ion-supported chelating deposition contribute to a dense and homogeneous protective Mg-PA coating, which guarantees an improved corrosion resistance as well as a reduced degradation rate. Moreover, the Mg-PA coating performed osteo-compatible to promote not only bioactivity of bonelike apatite precipitation, but also induced osteoblast cells adhesion and proliferation. This is ascribed to its nature of PA molecule and the biocompatible Mg ion, both of which mimic partly the compositional structure of bone. Our magnesium ion-integrated PA-coated Mg might bode well for the future of biodegradable bone implant application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据