4.8 Article

Autocatalysis and Selective Oxidative Etching Induced Synthesis of Platinum-Copper Bimetallic Alloy Nanodendrites Electrocatalysts

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 7301-7308

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am500656j

关键词

platinum-copper alloy; nanodendrites; polyallylamine; electrocatalytic activity; methanol oxidation reaction

资金

  1. NSFC [21376122, 21273116]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131395]
  3. United Fund of NSFC [U1137602]
  4. United Fund of Yunnan Province [U1137602]
  5. Industry-Academia Cooperation Innovation Fund Project of Jiangsu Province [BY2012001]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201402016]
  7. Shaanxi Normal University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The controllable synthesis of noble metal alloy nanostructures with highly branched morphology has attracted much attention because of their specific physical and chemical properties. This article reports the synthesis of platinum-copper bimetallic alloy nanodendrites (Pt-Cu BANDs) by a facile, one-pot, templateless, and seedless hydrothermal method in the presence of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and formaldehyde (HCHO). The morphology, composition, and structure of Pt-Cu BANDs are fully characterized by various physical techniques, demonstrating Pt-Cu BANDs are highly alloying, porous, and self-supported nanostructures. The formation/growth mechanism of Pt-Cu BANDs is explored and discussed based on the experimental observations. The autocatalytic growth and interdiffusion are responsible for the formation of Pt-Cu alloy whereas selective oxidative etching results in dendritic morphology of Pt-Cu alloy nanostructures. In addition, the electrocatalytic activity and stability of Pt-Cu BANDs for the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) are investigated by various electrochemical techniques. The synthesized Pt-Cu BANDs show higher electrocatalytic activity and stability than commercially available Pt black.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据