4.8 Article

Rational Construction of Strongly Coupled Metal-Metal Oxide-Graphene Nanostructure with Excellent Electrocatalytic Activity and Durability

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 10258-10264

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5016606

关键词

strong coupling; heterogeneous nanostructures; electrocatalyst; SnO2; graphene; methanol oxidation reaction

资金

  1. NSFC [21105030]
  2. Foundation for High-level Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong Province
  3. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Chem/Biosensing and Chemometrics [2012013]
  4. Student Innovative Project of Guangdong Province [1056412061]
  5. 211 Project of South China Agricultural University [2009B010100001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction within heterogeneous nanostructures can provide a great opportunity to radically enhance their electrocatalytic properties and increase their activity and durability. Here a rational, simple, and integrated strategy is reported to construct uniform and strongly coupled metal metal oxide-graphene nanostructure as an electrocatalyst with high performance. We first simply synthesized the interacted SnO2-prGO (protected and reduced graphene oxide) hybrid with SnO2 nanoparticles (similar to 4 nm) selectively anchored on the oxygenated defects of rGO using an in situ redox and hydrolysis reaction. After the deposition of Pt, uniform Pt NPs are found to contact intimately and exclusively with the SnO2 phase in the SnO2-prGO hybrid. This constructed nanostructure (Pt-SnO2-prGO) exhibits significantly improved electrocatalytic activity (2.19-fold) and durability (2.08-fold) toward methanol oxidation over that of the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. The detailed explanation of the strong coupling between SnO2 and graphene as well as between Pt and SnO2 is discussed, revealing that such a process can be used to immobilize various metal catalysts on metal-oxide-decorated catalysts for realizing advanced catalytic systems with enhanced performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据