4.6 Review

New tricks for old dogs: countering antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis with host-directed therapeutics

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 264, 期 1, 页码 344-362

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12255

关键词

tuberculosis; macrophage; drug; innate immunity

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health [K24AI089794, K08-AI102971, R01A107246201-A2, R01-AI056067-01]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Foundation
  3. Bio-Merieux Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the availability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) drugs for over 50years, tuberculosis (TB) remains at pandemic levels. New drugs are urgently needed for resistant strains, shortening duration of treatment, and targeting different stages of the disease, especially for treatment during human immunodeficiency virus co-infection. One solution to the conundrum that antibiotics kill the bacillus yet select for resistance is to target the host rather than the pathogen. Here, we discuss recent progress in so-called host-directed therapeutics' (HDTs), focusing on two general mechanistic strategies: (i) HDTs that disrupt Mtb pathogenesis in macrophages and (ii) immunomodulatory HDTs that facilitate protective immune responses that kill Mtb or reduce deleterious responses that exacerbate disease. HDTs hold significant promise as adjunctive therapies in that they are less likely to engender resistance, will likely have efficacy against antibiotic-resistant strains, and may have activity against non-replicating Mtb. However, TB is a complex and variegated disease, and human populations exhibit significant diversity in their immune responses to it, which presents a complicated landscape for HDTs to navigate. Nevertheless, we suggest that a detailed mechanistic understanding of drug action, together with careful selection of disease stage targetsand dosing strategies may overcome such limitations and allow the development of HDTs as effective adjunctive treatment options forTB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据