4.8 Article

Photoelectrochemical Biosensor Using Enzyme-Catalyzed in Situ Propagation of CdS Quantum Dots on Graphene Oxide

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 18, 页码 16197-16203

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5043164

关键词

quantum dots; graphene oxide; photoelectrochemistry; enzyme catalysis; biosensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475062, 21175069, 21205061]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu [BK2012448]
  3. Foundation of the Jiangsu Education Committee [11KJA150003]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative photoelectrochemical (PEC) biosensor platform was designed based on the in situ generation of CdS quantum dots (QDs) on graphene oxide (GO) using an enzymatic reaction. Horseradish peroxidase catalyzed the reduction of sodium thiosulfate with hydrogen peroxide to generate H2S, which reacted with Cd2+ to form CdS QDs. CdS QDs could be photoexcited to generate an elevated photocurrent as a readout signal. This strategy offered a green alternative to inconvenient presynthesis procedures for the fabrication of semiconducting nanoparticles. The nanomaterials and assembly procedures were characterized by microscopy and spectroscopy techniques. Combined with immune recognition and on the basis of the PEC activity of CdS QDs on GO, the strategy was successfully applied to a PEC assay to detect carcinoembryonic antigen and displayed a wide linear range from 2.5 ng mL(-1) to 50 mu g mL(-1) and a detection limit of 0.72 ng mL(-1) at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The PEC biosensor showed satisfactory performance for clinical sample detection and was convenient for determining high concentrations of solute without dilution. This effort offers a new opportunity for the development of numerous rapid and convenient analytical techniques using the PEC method that may be applied in the design and preparation of various solar-energy-driven applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据