4.8 Article

Surface Protein Imprinted Core-Shell Particles for High Selective Lysozyme Recognition Prepared by Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Strategy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 24, 页码 21954-21960

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5072783

关键词

molecularly imprinting; RAFT; protein recognition; core-shell particles; lysozyme

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB910601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [21190043, 21375128]
  3. Creative Research Group Project of the NSFC [21321064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel kind of lysozyme (Lys) surface imprinted core-shell particles was synthesized by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) strategy. With controllable polymer shell chain length, such particles showed obviously improved selectivity for protein recognition. After the RAFT initial agent and template protein was absorbed on silica particles, the prepolymerization solution, with methacrylic acid and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate as the monomers, and N,N'-methylenebis(acrylamide) as the cross-linker, was mixed with the silica particles, and the polymerization was performed at 40 degrees C in aqueous phase through the oxidation-reduction initiation. Ater polymerization, with the template protein removal and destroying dithioester groups with hexylamine, the surface Lyz imprinted particles were obtained with controllable polymer chain length. The binding capacity of the Lys imprinted particles could reach 5.6 mg protein/g material, with the imprinting factor (IF) as 3.7, whereas the IF of the control material prepared without RAFT strategy was only 1.6. The absorption equilibrium could be achieved within 60 min. Moreover, Lys could be selectively recognized by the imprinted particles from both a four-proteins mixture and egg white sample. All these results demonstrated that these particles prepared by RAFT strategy are promising to achieve the protein recognition with high selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据