4.8 Article

Scalable Fabrication of High-Performance NO2 Gas Sensors Based on Tungsten Oxide Nanowires by On-Chip Growth and RuO2-Functionalization

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 15, 页码 12022-12030

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5010078

关键词

tungsten oxide; nanowires; gas sensor; on-chip growth

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development [103.02-2014.18]
  2. VLIR-UOS under the Research Initiative Project [ZEIN2012RIP20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The on-chip growth and surface-functionalization have been recently regarded as promising techniques for large-scale fabrication of high performance nanowires gas sensors. Here we demonstrate a good NO2 gas-sensing performance of the tungsten oxide nanowires (TONWs) sensors realized by scalable on-chip fabrication and RuO2-functionalization. The gas response (R-g/R-a) of the RuO2-functionalized TONWs to S ppm of NO2 was 186.1 at 250 degrees C, which increased up to similar to 18.6-fold compared with that of the bare TONWs. On the contrary, the responses of the bare and functionalized sensors to 10 ppm of NH3, 10 ppm of H2S and 10 ppm of CO gases were very low of about 1.5, indicating the good selectivity. In addition, the TONW sensors fabricated by the on-chip growth technique exhibited a good reversibility up to 7 cycles switching from air-to-gas with a response of 19.8 +/- 0.033 (to 1 ppm of NO2), and this value was almost the same (about 19.5 +/- 0.027) for 11 cycles after three months storage in laboratory condition. The response and selectivity enhancement of RuO2-functionalzied TONWs sensors was attributed to the variation of electron depletion layer due to the formation of RuO2/TONWs Schottky junctions and/or the promotion of more adsorption sites for NO2 gas molecule on the surface of TONWs, whereas the good reversibility was attributed to the formation of the stable monoclinic WO3 from the single crystal of monoclinic W18O49 after annealing at 600 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据