3.8 Article

Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India

期刊

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.83279

关键词

Antibiogram; antibiotic sensitivity; bacterial resistance; gram negative bacteria; gram positive bacteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To fi nd out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for post-operative wound infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profi le. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study was carried out in patients of postoperative wound infection. Samples from wound discharge were collected using a sterile swab and studied for identifi cation of isolates by Gram stains and culture growth followed by in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing performed by disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar. Results: Out of 183 organisms, 126 (68.85%) isolated organisms were gram negative. Staphylococcus aureus, 48 (26.23%), was the predominant organism. S. aureus was sensitive to rifampicin (89.58%), levofl oxacin (60.42%), and vancomycin (54.17%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to ciprofl oxacin (83.78%), gatifl oxacin (51.35%), and meropenem (51.35%). Escherichia coli was sensitive to levofl oxacin (72.41%) and ciprofl oxacin (62.07%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was sensitive to ciprofl oxacin (63.16%), levofl oxacin (63.16%), gatifl oxacin (63.16%), and linezolid (56.52%). Proteus mirabilis was sensitive to ciprofl oxacin (75%) and linezolid (62.50). Proteus vulgaris was sensitive to ampicillin+ sulbactam (57.14%) followed by levofl oxacin (50%). Conclusions: There is an alarming increase of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, particularly in the emergence of VRSA/ VISA, meropenem, and third generation cephalosporin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Linezolid showing sensitivity against Gram negative bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据