4.8 Article

Fluorescent Light-up Probe with Aggregation-Induced Emission Characteristics for Alkaline Phosphatase Sensing and Activity Study

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 17, 页码 8784-8789

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am4026517

关键词

aggregation-induced emission; AIE fluorogen; light-up probe; alkaline phosphatase (ALP); enzyme activity; protein detection

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation [R279-000-323-281]
  2. Ministry of Defence [R279-000-340-232]
  3. Institute of Materials Research and Engineering [IMRE/11-1C0213]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKUST2/CRF/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorogens with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristics have attracted intensified research interest in biosensing applications, and those with specific targeting ability are especially desirable. In this work, we designed and synthesized an AIE fluorescent probe by functionalizing a tetraphenylethylene (TPE) fluorogen with two phosphate groups (TPE-phos) for the detection of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and its enzymatic activity based on the specific interaction between the probe and ALP. The probe is virtually nonfluorescent in aqueous media due to good water solubility. In the presence of ALP, the phosphate groups are cleaved through enzymatic hydrolysis, yielding a highly fluorescent product as a result of activated ME process. This light-up probe shows excellent selectivity toward ALP among a group of proteins. The detection limit is found to be 11.4 pM or 0.2 U L-1 in Tris buffer solution with a linear quantification range of 3-526 U L-1. The assay is also successfully performed in diluted serum with a linear range up to 175 U L-1, demonstrating its potential application in clinical analysis of ALP levels in real samples. Furthermore, by conducting kinetic analysis of the enzyme using TPE-phos as the substrate, the kinetic parameter k(cat)/K-M is determined to be 5.1 x 10(5) M-1 s(-1), indicating a high efficiency of the substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据