4.8 Article

Construction of Degradable Multilayer Films for Enhanced Antibacterial Properties

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 4136-4143

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am4000547

关键词

antibacterial; degradable; implant-associated infections; layer-by-layer self-assembly; thermal cross-linking; poly(acrylic acid)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50830106, 21174126, 51103126]
  2. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51025312]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB606203]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [SKLSSM201316]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110101110037, 20110101120049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infections associated with medical devices have become a major concern. The adhesion of bacteria to the devices' surfaces during the initial 24 h is believed to be a decisive period for implant-associated infections, which pose key challenges to optimal antiadhesion of microbes in this period. Herein, we have designed and constructed a (heparin/chitosan)(10)-(polyvinylpyrrolidone/poly(acrylic acid))(10) [(HEP/CHI)(10)-(PVP/PAA)(10)] multilayer film by layer-by-layer self-assembly. Assembly of the underlying (HEP/CHI)(10) multilayer film is based on electrostatic interactions, showing the properties of contact killing of bacteria. Deposition of the top (PVP/PAA)(10) multilayer film is based on hydrogen bond interactions. The PAA molecules are then cross-linked to form anhydride groups by thermal treatment at 110 degrees C for 16 h. Therefore, it shows a top-down degradable capability in the determined period, leading to almost no adhesion of bacteria in 24 h. Our system combining the adhesion resistance and the contact killing properties shows an enhanced antibacterial capability through targeting the decisive period of implantation may have great potential for applications in medical implants, tissue engineering, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据