4.8 Article

Fabrication of Free-Standing ZnMn2O4 Mesoscale Tubular Arrays for Lithium-Ion Anodes with Highly Reversible Lithium Storage Properties

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 21, 页码 11321-11328

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am403546s

关键词

direct growth; one-dimensional; free-standing ZnMn2O4 tubular arrays; aqueous cation exchange; Li-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MSIP) [2013029776]
  3. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System through NRF [0420-20120126]
  4. Core Technology Development Program from the Research Institute for Solar and Sustainable Energies (RISE/GIST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, ZnMn2O4 mesoscale tubular arrays on current collectors were successfully synthesized using a reactive template route combined with a postcalcination process through the shape-preserving conversion of ZnO nanorod arrays in aqueous solutions at room temperature. On the basis of the experimental analyses, including X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy, a plausible formation mechanism of ZnM2O4 tubular arrays was proposed in which solid ZnO nanorods are gradually transformed to ZnMn2O4 tubules via a simple cation exchange process between Zn2+ and Mn2+, followed by a postannealing process. Moreover, the lithium storage properties of the as-prepared ZnMn2O4 tubular structures were investigated by applying the structures as an active electrode material without auxiliary additives. The ZnMn2O4 array electrodes showed an excellent discharge capacity of ca. 1198.3 mAh g(-1) on the first cycle and exhibited outstanding cycling durability, rate capability, and Coulombic efficiency. These results indicate that the free-standing tubular array architectures of ZnMn2O4 prepared directly on the current collector can be powerful candidates for a highly reversible lithium storage electrode platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据