4.4 Article

Poly(I:C) induces controlled release of IL-36γ from keratinocytes in the absence of cell death

期刊

IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 1-3, 页码 228-235

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12026-015-8692-7

关键词

IL-36 gamma; Cytokines; Keratinocytes; TLR3; Papilloma

资金

  1. Feinstein Institute
  2. Elmezzi Graduate School
  3. NIH from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21 AI1105987]
  4. NIH from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R01 DE017227-06A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epithelium is part of an integrated immune system where cytokines, toll-like receptors and their ligands, and extracellular vesicles play a crucial role in initiating an innate immune response. IL-36 gamma is a pro-inflammatory member of the IL-1 family that is mainly expressed by epithelial cells, but regulation of its expression and release are only beginning to be understood. Previous studies reported that IL-36 gamma is abundant in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, a rare but devastating disease caused by human papillomaviruses (HPV) types 6 and 11, in which papillomas recurrently grow in and block the airway. Despite the overexpression of IL-36 gamma, papilloma tissues show no evidence of inflammation, possibly due to suppression of its release by HPVs. We have used primary human foreskin keratinocytes as a model to study IL-36 gamma regulation in normal epithelial cells. Low doses of poly(I:C) mediate expression and release of IL-36 gamma without inducing the cell death reported by those using high doses. PKR, an enzyme required for inflammasome activation, does not contribute to controlled release of IL36 gamma. The keratinocytes secrete IL-36 gamma in two forms, soluble and in extracellular vesicles. We conclude that there are two separately regulated pathways for the controlled secretion of IL-36 gamma from keratinocytes, which could contribute to the modulation of both local and systemic immune responses to viruses and other pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据