4.8 Article

Sulfur- and Nitrogen-Doped, Ferrocene-Derived Mesoporous Carbons with Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of Oxygen

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 23, 页码 12594-12601

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am4039294

关键词

fuel cells; electrocatalyst; ORR; non-precious-metal catalyst; doped carbons; mesoporous

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21101154, 21171163, 91127020]
  2. National Key Project on Basic Research [2011CB935904]
  3. NSF for Distinguished Young Scholars of Fujian Province [2013J06006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of inexpensive and sustainable cathode catalysts that can efficiently catalyze the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is of significance in practical application of fuel cells. Herein we report the synthesis of sulfur and nitrogen dual-doped, ordered mesoporous carbon (SN-OMCs), which shows outstanding ORR electrocatalytic properties. The material was synthesized from a surface-templating process of ferrocene within the channel walls of SBA-15 mesoporous silica by carbonization, followed by in situ heteroatomic doping with sulfur- and nitrogen-containing vapors. After etching away the metal and silica template, the resulting material features distinctive bimodal mesoporous carbon frameworks with high nitrogen Brunauer-Emmett-Teller specific surface area (of up to similar to 1100 m(2)/g) and uniform distribution of sulfur and nitrogen dopants. When employed as a noble-metal-free electrocatalyst for the ORR, such SN-OMC shows a remarkable electrocatalytic activity; improved durability and better resistance toward methanol crossover in oxygen reduction can be observed. More importantly, it performs a low onset voltage and an efficient nearly complete four-electron ORR process very similar to the observations in commercial 20 wt % Pt/C catalyst. In addition, we also found that the textural mesostructure of the catalyst has superseded the chemically bonded dopants to be the key factor in controlling the ORR performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据