4.8 Article

Titania Nanocoating on MnCO3 Microspheres via Liquid-Phase Deposition for Fabrication of Template-Assisted Core-Shell- and Hollow-Structured Composites

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 57-64

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am404052p

关键词

manganese carbonate microspheres; liquid phase deposition; sol-gel reaction; titania nanocomposite; core-shell and hollow structures; organic pollutant extraction

资金

  1. MEXT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel class of core-shell- and hollow-structured MnCO3/TiO2 composites was synthesized by titania nanocoating on MnCO3 microspheres via two-step liquid-phase deposition at room temperature. Morphological change from core shell to hollow microparticles was possible in the prepared samples by controlling prereaction time of MnCO3 and [NH4](2)TiF6. Upon the prereaction process, the core of the core shell MnCO3/TiO2 became highly porous, and a honeycomb-like surface that resembled the orientation of self-assembled MnCO3 nanocrystals was developed. The MnCO3 core was completely removed after 6 h prereaction. Calcination at 600 degrees C resulted in the transformation of both core-shell- and hollow-structured composites to Mn2O3/TiO2 anatase microspheres that retained their original morphologies. X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron probe microanalysis were employed for microsphere characterization. As the first trial for application of the synthesized materials, solid-extraction of organics from aqueous media was examined using methylene blue (MB). Both types of Mn2O3/TiO2 composites showed very fast adsorption of MB with high extraction values of 5.2 and 6.4 mu mol g(-1) for the core shell and hollow structures, respectively. Current work provides a new approach for facile fabrication of titania metal oxide nanocomposites with unique morphological features and promising application possibilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据