4.8 Article

Reducing Exciton Binding Energy by Increasing Thin Film Permittivity: An Effective Approach To Enhance Exciton Separation Efficiency in Organic Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 20, 页码 10105-10110

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am402744k

关键词

exciton binding energy; exciton separation efficiency; organic solar cells; permittivity; small molecule electron donor

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF DGE 1106400]
  3. Florida State University through the university Energy & Materials Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocurrent generation in organic solar cells requires that excitons, which are formed upon light absorption, dissociate into free carriers at the interface of electron acceptor and donor materials. The high exciton binding energy, arising from the low permittivity of organic semiconductor films, generally causes low exciton separation efficiency and subsequently low power conversion efficiency. We demonstrate here, for the first time, that the exciton binding energy in B,O-chelated azadipyrromethene (BO-ADPM) donor films is reduced by increasing the film permittivity by blending the BO-ADPM donor with a high dielectric constant small molecule, camphoric anhydride (CA). Various spectroscopic techniques, including impedance spectroscopy, photon absorption and emission spectroscopies, as well as X-ray spectroscopies, are applied to characterize the thin film electronic and photophysical properties. Planar heterojunction solar cells are fabricated with a BO-ADPM:CA film as the electron donor and C-60 as the acceptor. With an increase in the dielectric constant of the donor film from similar to 4.5 to similar to 11, the exciton binding energy is reduced and the internal quantum efficiency of the photovoltaic cells improves across the entire spectrum, with an similar to 30% improvement in the BO-ADPM photoactive region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据