4.8 Article

Nanocasting Technique to Prepare Lotus-leaf-like Superhydrophobic Electroactive Polyimide as Advanced Anticorrosive Coatings

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 1460-1467

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am3029377

关键词

superhydrophobic; electroactive; polyimide; anticorrosion; nanocasting

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan, R.O.C. [NSC 101-2113-M-033-005-MY1]
  2. Center-of-Excellence (COE) Program on Membrane Technology from MOE, R.O.C.
  3. Department of Chemistry at Chung Yuan Christian University (CYCU) [CYCU-01RD-RA002-11235]
  4. Center for Nanotechnology at CYCU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocasting technique was used to obtain a biomimetic superhydrophobic electroactive polyimide (SEPI) surface structure from a natural Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaf. An electroactive polyimide (EPI) was first synthesized through thermal imidization. An impression of the superhydrophobic Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaf was then nanocasted onto the surface of the EPI so that the resulting EPI was superhydrophobic and would prevent corrosion. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was then used as a negative template to transfer the impression of the superhydrophobic surface of the biomimetic EPI onto a cold-rolled steel (CRS) electrode. The superhydrophobic electroactive material could be used as advanced coatings that protect metals against corrosion. The morphology of the surface of the as-synthesized SEPI coating was investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The surface showed numerous micromastoids, each decorated with many nanowrinkles. The water contact angle (CA) for the SEPI coating was 155 degrees, which was significantly larger than that for the EPI coating (i.e., CA = 87 degrees). The significant increase in the contact angle indicated that the biomimetic morphology effectively repelled water. Potentiodynamic and electrochemical impedance spectroscopic measurements indicated that the SEPI coating offered better protection against corrosion than the EPI coating did.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据