4.8 Article

Synthesis and Properties of Electrically Conductive, Ductile, Extremely Long (∼50 μm) Nanosheets of KxCoO2•yH2O

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 18, 页码 8998-9007

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am402064g

关键词

nanosheets; electrical conductor; metal oxide; turbostratic; HR-TEM; ductile; high anisotropy

资金

  1. Energy Materials Center at Cornell (EMC2), an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science [DESC0001086]
  3. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1120296]
  4. National Science Foundation [CHE-1152922]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [1152922] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extremely long, electrically conductive, ductile, free-standing nanosheets of water-stabilized KxCoO2 center dot yH(2)O are synthesized using the sol gel and electric-field induced kinetic-demixing (SGKD) process. Room temperature in-plane resistivity of the KxCoO2 center dot yH(2)O nanosheets is less than similar to 4.7 m Omega.cm, which corresponds to one of the lowest resistivity values reported for metal oxide nanosheets. The synthesis produces tens of thousands of very high aspect ratio (50,000:50,000:1 = length/width/thickness), millimeter length nanosheets stacked into a macro-scale pellet. Free-standing nanosheets up to similar to 50 mu m long are readily delaminated from the stacked nanosheets. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) studies of the free-standing nanosheets indicate that the delaminated pieces consist of individual nanosheet crystals that are turbostratically stacked. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies confirm that the nanosheets are stacked in perfect registry along their c-axis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) based statistical analysis show that the average thickness of the nanosheets is similar to 13 nm. The nanosheets show ductility with a bending radius as small as similar to 5 nm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据