4.8 Article

Evaporating Graphene Oxide Sheets (GOSs) for Rolled up GOSs and Its Applications in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 1481-1488

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am302995c

关键词

graphene oxide; evaporation; carbon nanoscroll; topological transformation; porous supporting material; Nafion; proton exchange membrane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21276051]
  2. Chinese doctoral fund [20110071130001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [12ZR1401900]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB930000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, we prepare rolled up graphene oxide sheets (GOSs) by evaporating GOSs from their dispersion to a remote aluminum foil surface. The topological structure of the rolled up GOSs on the aluminum foil surface, which is determined by the quantity of the formed Al3+ ions from the reaction between the alumina on the aluminum foil surface and the weak acidic condensed vapor of the GOS dispersion, can be easily controlled via simply changing the H2O content in the original GOS dispersion. Meanwhile, a GO/Nafion composite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell is successfully prepared utilizing the as-obtained hole-like self-assembled structure of the rolled-up GOSs as a supporting material. The resultant composite membrane exhibits excellent proton conductivity compared to that of the recast Nafion membrane, especially under low-humidity conditions. An increase in proton conductivity by several times could be easily observed here, which is mainly attributed to the rearrangement of the microstructures of Nafion matrix to significantly facilitate the proton transport with rolled up GOSs being independently incorporated. The method reported here offers new degrees of freedom to achieve such transformations among the allotropic forms of carbon and/or develop new carbon material/polymer composite materials with excellent properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据