4.8 Article

Facile Synthesis of Few-Layer Graphene with a Controllable Thickness Using Rapid Thermal Annealing

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 1777-1782

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am3000177

关键词

graphene; rapid thermal annealing (RTA); few-layer; nickel; crystallization; transparent conductor

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0009824, 2010-0004370, 2011-0029212, 2011-0014877]
  3. Human Resources Development Program through the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant
  4. Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20114030200010]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0014877, 2010-0004370, 2010-0009824] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few-layer graphene films with a controllable thickness were grown on a nickel surface by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) under vacuum. The instability of nickel films in air facilitates the spontaneous formation of ultrathin (<2-3 nm) carbon- and oxygen-containing compounds on a nickel surface; thus, the high-temperature annealing of the nickel samples without the introduction of intentional carbon-containing precursors results in the formation of graphene films. From annealing temperature and ambient studies during RTA, it was found that the evaporation of oxygen atoms from the surface is the dominant factor affecting the formation of graphene films. The thickness of the graphene layers is strongly dependent on the RTA temperature and time, and the resulting films have a limited thickness (<2 nm), even for an extended RTA time. The transferred films have a low sheet resistance of +/- 0.4 k Omega/sq, with similar to 94% +/- 2% optical transparency, making them useful for applications as flexible transparent conductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据