4.8 Article

Iodine-Stabilized Cu Nanoparticle Chitosan Composite for Antibacterial Applications

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 1313-1323

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am201586w

关键词

iodine; Cu nanoparticle; chitosan; composite; bactericide; green fluorescent protein

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT)
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [09/731(0061)/2008-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report herein the synthesis of a new composite consisting of Cu nanoparticles (NPs) and chitosan (CS), which has been found to be stable in the presence of molecular iodine and has also high antimicrobial activities. The composite could be obtained when aqueous CuSO4 was treated with hydrazine in the presence of CS. The spherical Cu NPs present in the composite were of average diameters 8+/-4 nm. The NPs were unstable in atmospheric conditions leading to the formation of oxides of Cu. On the other hand, when molecular iodine was added to the medium following synthesis the NPs were rather stable. Studies of antibacterial property were carried out on Gram-negative green fluorescent expressing Escherichia coli bacteria & Gram-positive Bacillus cereus bacteria. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the iodinated composite on Escherichia coli was found to be 130.8 mu g/mL, which contained 21.5 mu g/mL Cu NPs. This determined value of MIC for Cu NPs was much lower than those reported in the literature. Zeta potential (zeta) measurements supported an attractive interaction between iodinated CS-Cu NP composite and bacteria which was further supported by electron microscopic images. Electron microscopic and flow cytometric studies revealed that the iodinated CS-Cu NP composite was attached to the bacterial cell wall, which caused irreversible damage to the membrane, eventually leading to cell death. Mechanism of bactericidal action of the iodinated composite is discussed in light of our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据