4.8 Article

Strategy To Enhance the Wettability of Bioacive Paper-Based Sensors

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 6573-6578

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am301699m

关键词

paper-based; bioactivity; wettability; low-cost diagnostics; blood typing; plasma treatment

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [ARC DP1094179, LP110200973]
  2. Monash University Research and Graduate School
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program (RGJ)
  4. Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CC)
  5. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a potential method that can restore the wettability of bioactive paper-based sensors while maintaining their bioactivity. This study is driven by the need to increase the wettability of the antibody-loaded blood typing paper devices in order to increase the blood typing assaying speed using such paper devices. Plasma treatment is used to improve the wettability of bioactive paper; the protective effect of bovine serum albumin (BSA) to biomolecules against plasma deactivation is investigated. In the first stage, horseradish percoddase (HRP) was used as a model biomolecule, because of the convenience of its quantifiable colorimetric reaction with a substrate. By using this protection approach, the inactivation of biomolecules on paper during the plasma treatment is significantly slowed down. This approach enables plasma treatment to be used for fabricating paper-based bioactive sensors to achieve strong wettability for rapid penetration of liquid samples or reagents. Finally, we demonstrate the use of plasma treatment to increase the wettability of antibody treated blood typing paper. After the treatment, the blood typing paper becomes highly wettable; it allows much faster penetration of blood samples into the plasma treated testing paper. Antibodies on the paper are still sufficiently active for blood typing and can report patients' blood type accurately.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据