4.7 Review

Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 652-680

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00269.x

关键词

adaptability; bacterial species concept; comparative genomics; Pseudomonas genome

资金

  1. USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2006-35604-16673, 2010-65110-20392]
  2. United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research
  3. NIFA [2010-65110-20392, 581183] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Members of the genus Pseudomonas inhabit a wide variety of environments, which is reflected in their versatile metabolic capacity and broad potential for adaptation to fluctuating environmental conditions. Here, we examine and compare the genomes of a range of Pseudomonas spp. encompassing plant, insect and human pathogens, and environmental saprophytes. In addition to a large number of allelic differences of common genes that confer regulatory and metabolic flexibility, genome analysis suggests that many other factors contribute to the diversity and adaptability of Pseudomonas spp. Horizontal gene transfer has impacted the capability of pathogenic Pseudomonas spp. in terms of disease severity (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and specificity (Pseudomonas syringae). Genome rearrangements likely contribute to adaptation, and a considerable complement of unique genes undoubtedly contributes to strain- and species-specific activities by as yet unknown mechanisms. Because of the lack of conserved phenotypic differences, the classification of the genus has long been contentious. DNA hybridization and genome-based analyses show close relationships among members of P. aeruginosa, but that isolates within the Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. syringae species are less closely related and may constitute different species. Collectively, genome sequences of Pseudomonas spp. have provided insights into pathogenesis and the genetic basis for diversity and adaptation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据