4.8 Article

An Interleukin-33-Mast Cell-Interleukin-2 Axis Suppresses Papain-Induced Allergic Inflammation by Promoting Regulatory T Cell Numbers

期刊

IMMUNITY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 175-186

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Program for Improvement of Research Environment for Young Researchers
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  5. Banyu Life Science Foundation International
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030-140772]
  7. NIH [AI070813, AI023990, CA072074, U19AI104209]
  8. MRC [MC_U105178805] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178805] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05786, 15H02515, 15H04866, 15K09560, 15K15377, 15H01267, 15H01162] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

House dust mite-derived proteases contribute to allergic disorders in part by disrupting epithelial barrier function. Interleukin-33 (IL-33), produced by lung cells after exposure to protease allergens, can induce innate-type airway eosinophilia by activating natural helper (NH) cells, a member of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), to secrete Th2 type-cytokines. Because IL-33 also can induce mast cells (MCs) to secrete Th2 type-cytokines, MCs are thought to cooperate with NH cells in enhancing protease or IL-33-mediated innate-type airway eosinophilia. However, we found that MC-deficient Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice exhibited exacerbated protease-induced lung inflammation associated with reduced numbers of regulatory T (Treg) cells. Moreover, IL-2 produced by IL-33-stimulated MCs promoted expansion of numbers of Treg cells, thereby suppressing development of papain-or IL-33-induced airway eosinophilia. We have thus identified a unique anti-inflammatory pathway that can limit induction of innate-type allergic airway inflammation mediated by NH cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据