4.8 Article

Effects of Reactive Compatibilization on the Morphological, Thermal, Mechanical, and Rheological Properties of Intumescent Flame-Retardant Polypropylene

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 452-459

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am8001204

关键词

reactive compatibilization; polypropylene; morphology; thermal properties; mechanical property; rheological properties

资金

  1. Science and Technology Bureau of Ningbo City [2007B10015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50873092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flame retardant polypropyene (PP) samples were in situ compatibilized with maleic anhydride grafted PP. Compatibilization reaction was verified by an IR spectrum and gel content measurements. Electron microscopy images showed that compatibilization could considerably reduce the size of the flame retardant domains, control the phase morphology and improve the interfacial adhesion between PP and intumescent flame retardant (IFR) with different IFR loading levels. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) of flame retardant PP increased to different extents after compatibilization indicating an improvement in the flame retardancy Compatibilization enhanced the thermal stability of some extent and remarkably delayed thermal oxidative degradation of flame retardant PP. For PP containing 20 wt % flame retardant the temperature at which the maximum weight loss rate occurred was enhanced by about 99 degrees C after compatibilization. The storage modulus and glass transition temperatures were elevated to different extents. Tensile strengths of samples reduced in the presence of flame retardant alone but in the additional presence of compatibilizer were restored to levels similar to those of pure PP. Elongation at break values, however, showed IFR concentration dependent reductions that were less for compatibilized samples. Furthermore the complex viscosity of a compatibilized PP melt turned slightly smaller which is favorable to melt processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据