4.7 Article

Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the new millennium

期刊

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 1094-1105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.006

关键词

Rural transformation development; Urban-rural coordination development; Industrialization and urbanization; Assessing indicator system; Regional inequality; Territorial type; GIS; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the turn of the new millennium, the Chinese central government has focused significant attention on substantially improving rural residents' well-being and achieving the coordinated development of urban and rural areas. This paper examines China's rural transformation development based on three assessing indicator systems (the rural development level, the rural transformation level, and the urban-rural coordination level), using government socioeconomic data from 2000 to 2008. Spatial and statistical analyses, supported by SPSS 13 and ArcGIS 9.2 software, show that rural China has experienced universal and intense transformative development since 2000. China's urban-rural coordination development declined greatly between 2000 and 2008. Our analysis shows that rural transformation development that corresponds to a certain rural development level will lead to the effective development of regional rural systems and an improved urban-rural relationship. This paper suggests that more attention needs to be paid to the powerful factors that fuel rural transformation development, especially in coastal China, to coordinate urban-rural development under the pressure of rapid industrialization and urbanization in the new century. Given the multiscale nature of regional inequalities in rural transformation development, improving rural development policies aimed at various rural transformation development types might be the most effective way to shape a more coordinated urban-rural development pattern in China. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据