4.4 Article

The Subjective Effects of Alcohol-Tobacco Co-Use: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Investigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 557-571

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0023033

关键词

alcohol; cigarettes; electronic diary; craving; reinforcement

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [K05 AA017242-01, K05 AA017688, P50 AA011998-01, T32AA01352, K05 AA017242, P50 AA011998, T32 AA013526-10, T32 AA013526, K05AA017242, K05 AA017688-01, P50AA011998, K05AA017688] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alcohol and tobacco use covary at multiple levels of analysis, and co-use of the 2 substances may have profound health consequences. To characterize the motivationally relevant processes contributing to co-use, the current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine the subjective consequences of naturally occurring simultaneous use of alcohol and tobacco. Current smokers who reported frequently drinking alcohol (N = 259) used electronic diaries to monitor their daily experiences for 21 days. Participants responded to prompted assessments and also initiated recordings when they smoked a cigarette or completed the first drink in a drinking episode. Momentary reports of smoking and alcohol consumption were associated with one another, and these effects remained after adjustment for occasion- and person-level covariates. When participants consumed alcohol, they reported increased pleasure and decreased punishment from the last cigarette. Smoking was associated with small increases in pleasure from the last drink. Ratings of buzzed and dizzy were synergistically affected by co-use of alcohol and tobacco. Co-use was also followed by higher levels of craving for both alcohol and tobacco. Results point to the importance of reward and incentive processes in ongoing drug use and suggest that alcohol intensifies real-time reports of the motivational consequences of smoking more strongly than smoking affects corresponding appraisals of alcohol effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据