4.4 Article

Radar-based fall detection based on Doppler time-frequency signatures for assisted living

期刊

IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 164-172

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0250

关键词

image classification; Doppler radar; time-frequency analysis; assisted living; accident prevention; radar detection; CW radar; image motion analysis; support vector machines; learning (artificial intelligence); Bayes methods; radar imaging; medical image processing; radar Doppler time-frequency signature; assisted living; public health concern; accidental death; senior U; S; population; continuous wave radar system; feature joint statistics; sparse Bayesian classifler; relevance vector machine; Laboratory experiments; radar data collection; motion pattern; grey scale image classiflcation; radar-based fall detection scheme

资金

  1. NPRP Grant from the Qatar National Research Fund (Qatar Foundation) [NPRP 6-680-2-282]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Falls are a major public health concern and main causes of accidental death in the senior U.S. population. Timely and accurate detection permit immediate assistance after a fall and, thereby, reduces complications of fall risk. Radar technology provides an effective means for this purpose because it is non-invasive, insensitive to lighting conditions as well as obstructions, and has less privacy concerns. In this study, the authors develop an effective fall detection scheme for the application in continuous-wave radar systems. The proposed scheme exploits time-frequency characteristics of the radar Doppler signatures, and the motion events are classified using the joint statistics of three different features, including the extreme frequency, extreme frequency ratio, and the length of event period. Sparse Bayesian classifier based on the relevance vector machine is used to perform the classification. Laboratory experiments are performed to collect radar data corresponding to different motion patterns to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据