期刊
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 270-284出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.804345
关键词
accountability; disagreement; peer review; rating
Accountability to authors and readers cannot exist without proper peer review practices. Thus, the information a journal seeks from its peer reviewers and how it makes use of this information is paramount. Disagreement amongst peer reviewers can be considerable, resulting in very diverse comments to authors. Incorporating a clear scoring system for key concrete items and requiring referees to provide justification for scores may ensure that reviewers contribute in a consistently fair and effective manner. This article evaluates information collected from reviewers and proposes an example of a system that aims to improve accountability, while having the potential to make it easier for reviewers to perform a more objective review.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据