期刊
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 130-145出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08989621003791945
关键词
editor engagement; peer review shortcomings
Peer review gives research a stamp of approval, but the reviews themselves can be flawed. This is potentially serious for the writer, the journal, and journal user. This study describes shortcomings of the peer review process and condenses them into an explanatory framework involving situational, personal, social, and ethical factors. Some proposals to improve matters are impractical and may make them worse. Some data is offered which illustrates the problem and suggests a potential solution. Informed editors who avoid mechanical approaches engage cautiously and critically with reviews and guard against bias, even in themselves, could make a significant difference.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据