4.6 Article

Mean Thoracic Aortic Wall Thickness Determination by Cine MRI with Steady-State Free Precession: Validation with Dark Blood Imaging

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1004-1008

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.014

关键词

Aortic wall thickness; magnetic resonance imaging; thoracic aorta; dark blood; steady-state free precession

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of measuring mean aortic wall thickness (MAWT) of the ascending and descending aorta using cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging compared to dark blood (DB) imaging. Materials and Methods: DB and SSFP images of the thoracic aorta acquired at 1.5 Tin 50 volunteers (26 women, 24 men; mean age: 50.2 +/- 13.1 years) were used. MAWT was calculated on DB and SSFP images for the ascending and descending aorta at the level of the right pulmonary artery by two independent observers. Validity was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, Passing-Bablok regression, and Spearman correlation. Reliability was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass coefficients (ICCs). Results: The mean MAWT of the ascending aorta on DB and SSFP images was 1.89 +/- 0.21 mm and 1.87 +/- 0.20 mm. The measurements for the descending aorta were 1.60 +/- 0.22 and 1.63 +/- 0.20 mm, respectively. Comparison of DB and SSFP measurements revealed a mean bias of 1.3% (95% limits of agreement (LOA): -7.9, 10.5%) for the ascending and of 2.1% (LOA: -10.5, 6.3%) for the descending aorta. The corresponding regression equation was y = 0.042 + 0.960 x (r = 0.91; P < .0001) and y = 0.118 + 0.939 x (r = 0.95; P < .0001), respectively. Intra- and interobserver variability showed a mean bias of less than 2.0% and LOA of less than +/- 15.0%. ICCs were greater than or equal to 0.85. Conclusions: MAWT determination in the ascending and descending aorta using cine SSFP sequences is highly valid and reliable compared to DB imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据