4.6 Article

Preoperative and Intraoperative Sonographic Visibility of Collagen-Based Breast Biopsy Marker Clips

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 340-347

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.017

关键词

Breast cancer; ultrasound; biopsy marker clips; wire localization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the sonographic visibility of implanted collagen-based breast biopsy marker clips in the clinic and operating room. Materials and Methods: Female patients aged >= 18 years who presented for preoperative surgical evaluation within 4 weeks of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy and collagen-based marker clip placement were eligible for this pilot study. The sonographic visibility of the marker clips was rated from 1 (not visible) to 5 (clearly visible) by surgeons at the preoperative appointment, by radiologists at wire localization, and by surgeons in the operating room. Visibility was considered inadequate for values of 1 or 2 and adequate for values of 3, 4, or 5. The data were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for paired differences across physician (radiologist vs surgeon), time (preoperative visit vs day of surgery), and target (lesion vs clip). Results: Twenty-five patients with 26 lesions were enrolled, and 19 patients returned for all imaging procedures. The mean lesion size was 12 mm (range, 5-24 mm). Adequate marker clip visibility assessed by the surgeons decreased from 80% (20 of 25) at the preoperative appointment to 65% (11 of 17) in the operating room, but the difference was not significant (P = .27). Visibilities of the lesions and clips were similar at the preoperative appointment (P = .61), but the clips were significantly less visible on the day of operation (P = .03). Conclusion: The sonographic visibility of collagen-based marker clips is variable and likely decreases over time but may be adequate to guide intraoperative surgical excision in many cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据