4.6 Article

Estimation of the Ischemic Penumbra Based on CT Perfusion: A Pilot Study

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 1535-1542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.08.016

关键词

Computed tomography perfusion; magnetic resonance imaging; receiver operating characteristic curve; ischemic penumbra; brain

资金

  1. National Nature Science Funds [30370434]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB732500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives: Ischemic penumbra (IF), the target of thrombolytic therapies, could be estimated by the mismatch region between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion- and perfusion-defined abnormalities; however, the accuracy of this method has been challenged recently. In this study, we try to establish a method for calculating IP size based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and to observe the early evolution of IF in detail. Materials and Methods: The middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model in monkey was used to compare the accuracy in estimating the IF between CTP and MRI methods. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to calculate the IF threshold of the different CTP parameters, and then the best parameter was obtained. The dynamic evolutions of estimated size of IF by these two methods were compared. Results: Among the three CTP parameters, relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) had the highest sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (98.5%) in estimating the IP. The optimal cutoff threshold of rCBF was 0.203. During the first 15 hours of the MCAO model, the estimated size of IF by the rCBF was larger than that of the MRI method; however, this relationship was reversed 15 hours later. Conclusion: This study suggests that the rCBF method is more accurate in estimating the IP since previous studies have reported that the MRI method underestimated the exact IF in the early stage of ischemia and overestimated the exact IF in the later stages. Further experimental and clinical studies are needed to validate the conclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据