4.6 Editorial Material

Perceptions of Ghanaian Medical Students Completing a Clinical Elective at the University of Michigan Medical School

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 89, 期 7, 页码 1014-1017

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000291

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Fogarty International Center [R25 TW009345]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health
  3. NIH Office of the Director Office of Research on Women's Health and the Office of AIDS Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Problem International medical electives typically represent a unidirectional flow of students from economically advantaged countries in the global North to resource-poor nations in the global South. Little is known about the impact of bilateral exchanges on students from less affluent nations. Approach Since 2007, students from the University of Michigan Medical School (UMMS) and medical schools in Ghana have engaged in a bilateral clinical exchange program. A 45-item online survey was distributed to all 73 Ghanaian medical students who had rotated at UMMS from 2008 to 2010 to assess perspectives on the value and impact of their participation. Outcomes Incoming Ghanaian students outnumbered outgoing UMMS students 73 to 33 during the study period. Of eligible Ghanaian students, 70% (51/73) participated in the survey, with 40 of 51 providing valid data on at least 50% of questions. Ninety-seven percent (37/38) reported that the UMMS rotation was valuable to their medical training, 90% (35/39) reported changes in how they approach patient care, and 77% (24/31) reported feeling better equipped to serve patients in their home community. Eighty-five percent of students (28/33) felt more inclined to pursue training opportunities outside of their home country after their rotation at UMMS. Next Steps More studies are needed to determine the feasibility of bidirectional exchanges as well as the short-term and long-term impact of rotations on students from underresourced settings and their hosts in more resource-rich environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据