4.3 Article

From the Lesbian Ghetto to Ambient Community: The Perceived Costs and Benefits of Integration for Community

期刊

SOCIAL PROBLEMS
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 361-388

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1525/sp.2011.58.3.361

关键词

community; queer; lesbian; integration; social ties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drawing on an ethnography of queer women in Ithaca, New York, this article documents the perceived costs and benefits for a minority group's ties of changing attitudes, identities, and legislation. It reveals that despite the high proportion of queer women in Ithaca most informants report disappointment with community. However, this disappointment does not correlate with a dearth of affective local ties; queer women detail a wealth of supportive ties to heterosexual and queer neighbors. Informants' simultaneous disappointment with community and rich local ties emerge from: (1) a shift from identity politics and networks to emphasis on shared cultural, social, and political tastes and activities; (2) the breadth of the queer female population; and (3) queer women's successful integration into Ithaca's social, cultural, and political spheres. From informants' perspectives these conditions weaken real community, which they associate with homogenous place-based networks of marginalized individuals, and promote a strong sense of ambient community: feelings of belonging and connection that arise from informal, voluntary, and affective ties largely fashioned around shared tastes and activities and predicated on a sense of safety and acceptance forged among heterogeneous proximate individuals. Contra the prevailing expectation that place-based ties best flourish among marginalized individuals who share a dominant identity and formal institutions, the article demonstrates that when social and cultural conditions change local ties change, too they do not simply disappear. Social and cultural shifts alter the foundation of local ties and informants' assessment thereof

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据