4.6 Article

Slowing Down to Stay Out of Trouble in the Operating Room: Remaining Attentive in Automaticity

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 85, 期 10, 页码 1571-1577

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f073dd

关键词

-

资金

  1. Physician Services, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Automaticity is integral to expert performance, but experts must be able to transition from an automatic mode into a more effortful state when required. In this study, the authors identified and characterized the manifestations of the phenomenon of slowing down when you should to stay out of trouble in operative practice. Method The authors interviewed 28 surgeons (60-minute, semistructured format) from various specialties at four academic medical centers and observed 5 hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons in the operating room (29 cases, 147 hours) during 2007-2009. Using a grounded theory qualitative methodology, they conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts and field notes in an iterative manner. Data collection continued until saturation. They adopted a reflexive approach throughout. Results Surgeons described and the authors observed four phenomenological manifestations of the transition to a more effortful state. In the most extreme manifestation, stopping, surgeons actually stopped the procedure, whereas in the most subtle manifestation, fine-tuning, surgeons were able to continue the procedure and focus on minor events simultaneously. A separate phenomenon of drifting represented surgeons' failure to transition out of the automatic mode when appropriate, resulting in surgical errors or near misses. Conclusions The manifestations of the slowing down phenomenon represent acts of cognitive refocusing during the potentially more-critical moments of operative practice. Further, the authors challenge the conception of automaticity as effortless, arguing that automatic behavior can be attentive (fine-tuning) as well as inattentive (drifting).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据