期刊
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1359-1367出版社
INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0648
关键词
collective intelligence; scientific communities; academic paradigms; organization science
类别
资金
- Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
- Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0963451] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Whereas some suggest that consensus is the desirable end goal in fields of science, this paper suggests that the existing literature on collective intelligence offers key alternative insights into the evolution of knowledge in scientific communities. Drawing on the papers in this special issue, we find that the papers fall across a spectrum of convergent, divergent, and reflective activities. In addition, we find there to be a set of ongoing theoretical tensions common across the papers. We suggest that this diversity of activities and ongoing theoretical tensions-both signs of collective intelligence-may be a far more appropriate measure than consensus of the health of a scientific community.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据