4.6 Article

Global bounded consensus in heterogeneous multi-agent systems with directed communication graph

期刊

IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 147-152

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0530

关键词

directed graphs; network theory (graphs); linear matrix inequalities; multi-agent systems; Lyapunov methods; nonlinear dynamical systems; eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; nonlinear control systems; distributed control; global bounded consensus; heterogeneous multiagent systems; directed communication graph network; nonlinear dynamics; distributed consensus protocol; quadratic Lyapunov function; lower-dimension linear matrix inequalities; sufficient condition; Laplacian matrix; matrix eigenvalues; several scalar inequalities; coupling strengths; proper path strategy; limited conservatism; weighted networks; cooperative heterogeneous agents

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [61004106, 61104119, 61374053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the consensus problem for cooperative heterogeneous agents with non-linear dynamics in a directed communication network. Global bounded consensus is studied by employing a quadratic Lyapunov function, and a distributed consensus protocol is designed by solving a few lower-dimension linear matrix inequalities associated with the dynamics of the heterogeneous agents. A sufficient condition corresponding to the semi-positive definiteness of the Laplacian matrix and the non-linear dynamics of each agent is obtained to guarantee the boundedness of consensus. In particular, to avoid the calculation of matrix eigenvalues, a sufficient condition is also obtained in the form of several scalar inequalities involving the coupling strengths and the property of all paths between agent pairs under a proper path strategy. The presented framework for designing protocols is quite simple with limited conservatism, which can be effectively used to design consensus protocols of various weighted and directed networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据