4.4 Article

Templated Ultrathin Polyelectrolyte Microreservoir for Delivery of Bovine Serum Albumin: Fabrication and Performance Evaluation

期刊

AAPS PHARMSCITECH
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 344-353

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-011-9593-2

关键词

biocompatible; cell adhesion; electrostatic attraction; layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly; natural polyelectrolyte

资金

  1. CSIR XI Network [NWP 0035]
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New-Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to develop ultrathin polyelectrolyte microreservoir (UPM) using two combinations of synthetic/synthetic (S/s; poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH)/sodium poly(styrenesulfonate)) and synthetic/natural (S/n; PAH/sodium alginate) polyelectrolytes over spherical porous CaCO3 core particles (CP) followed by core removal and to evaluate its biocompatibility and integrity of loaded model protein bovine serum albumin (BSA). A novel process for synthesis of CP was developed to obtain maximum yield of monodisperse vaterite (spherical) polymorph. The prepared UPM was characterized for surface morphology, layer-by-layer growth, pay load efficiency, integrity of BSA, as well as viability and cell adhesion using murine J 774 macrophages (I broken vertical bar). In vitro release profile revealed that both S/s and S/n UPM were able to provide sufficient diffusion barrier to release protein at physiological pH. It has been observed that S/n UPM are fully biocompatible due to obvious reason of using natural polymer. In a separate experiment, the S/s UPM surface was modified with pluronic F-68 to tune biocompatibility which provides evidences for safety and tolerability of the S/s UPM as well. In nutshell, the proposed system could successfully be used for the delivery of proteins, and moreover, the system can be tailored to impart desired properties at any stage of layering especially in terms of drug release and to retain the integrity of proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据