4.4 Article

Monitoring Granulation Rate Processes Using Three PAT Tools in a Pilot-Scale Fluidized Bed

期刊

AAPS PHARMSCITECH
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 1083-1091

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-008-9145-6

关键词

acoustic emission; FBRM; granulation; near-infra red; PAT

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR
  2. Agency for Science, Technology and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this research was to analyze and compare the responses of three Process Analytical Technology ( PAT) techniques applied simultaneously to monitor a pilot-scale fluidized bed granulation process. Real-time measurements using focused beam reflectance measurement (Lasentec FBRM) and near-infra red spectroscopy (Bruker NIR) were taken by inserting in-line probes into the fluidized bed. Non-intrusive acoustic emission measurements ( Physical Acoustic AE) were performed by attaching piezoelectric sensors on the external wall of the fluidized bed. Powder samples were collected at regular intervals during the granulation process and characterized offline using laser diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, stereo-optical microscopy and loss on drying method. PAT data comprising chord length distribution and chord count ( from FBRM), absorption spectra ( from NIR) and average signal levels and counts ( from AE) were compared with the particle properties measured using offline samples. All three PAT techniques were able to detect the three granulation regimes or rate processes ( wetting and nucleation, consolidation and growth, breakage) to varying degrees of sensitivity. Being dependent on optical signals, the sensitivities of the FBRM and NIR techniques were susceptible to fouling on probe windows. The AE technique was sensitive to background fluidizing air flows and external interferences. The sensitivity, strengths and weaknesses of the PAT techniques examined may facilitate the selection of suitable PAT tools for process development and scale-up studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据