4.6 Article

Modeling the Effects of Vaccination and Treatment on Pandemic Influenza

期刊

AAPS JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 427-437

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-011-9284-7

关键词

infectious diseases; mathematical models; time-dependent transmission; vaccination and treatment strategies

资金

  1. NSF [DMS-0719697, DMS-1022758]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1022758] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we demonstrate the uses of some simple mathematical models for the study of disease dynamics in a pandemic situation with a focus on influenza. These models are employed to evaluate the effectiveness of various control programs via vaccination and antiviral treatment. We use susceptible-, infectious-, recovered-type epidemic models consisting of ordinary differential equations. These models allow us to derive threshold conditions that can be used to assess the effectiveness of vaccine and drug use and to determine disease outcomes. Simulations are helpful for examining the potential consequences of control options under different scenarios. Particularly, results from models with constant parameters and models with time-dependent parameter functions are compared, demonstrating the significant differences in model outcomes. Results suggest that the effectiveness of vaccination and drug treatment can be very sensitive to factors including the time of introduction of the pathogen into the population, the beginning time of control programs, and the levels of control measures. More importantly, in some cases, the benefits of vaccination and antiviral use might be significantly compromised if these control programs are not designed appropriately. Mathematical models can be very useful for understanding the effects of various factors on the spread and control of infectious diseases. Particularly, the models can help identify potential adverse effects of vaccination and drug treatment in the case of pandemic influenza.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据