4.5 Article

Source of molten elemental sulfur and hydrogen sulfide from the Inigok well, northern Alaska

期刊

AAPG BULLETIN
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 337-354

出版社

AMER ASSOC PETROLEUM GEOLOGIST
DOI: 10.1306/05021110202

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elemental sulfur (S-0) and high-pressure hydrogen sulfide (H2S), the first recorded occurrence of both from a well in northern Alaska, were encountered in the Husky 1 Inigok exploratory well in 1978. Located about 100 mi (160 km) southwest of Prudhoe Bay, the well was targeting an anticlinal structure on the northeast flank of a large late Paleozoic basin beneath the coastal plain and foothills region of the eastern National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. The sulfur and gas first appeared at a depth of 17,570 ft (5355 m) while drilling in dark-gray to black organic carbon depleted Carboniferous limestones (the Lisburne Group) at a temperature of 347 degrees F, well above the melting point of S-0. Solidification of the molten sulfur by cooling during the drilling operation caused the drillstem to stick and delayed drilling operations for several months before being released. To determine the nature and source of the sulfur and H2S and to establish any relationship between them, we performed chemical analyses on S-0, drilling mud, and cuttings. Numerous holes and vesicles in some sulfur samples indicate the presence of gas, but other samples, without vesicles, contain sharp edges, fractures, and x-ray diffraction patterns characteristic of ortho-rhombic and not amorphous sulfur, thus arguing against a molten source in these samples. Isotopic values suggest that the sulfide in widely separated mud samples has a common source, and that the delta S-34 values for S-0 are slightly more enriched in S-32 in all deeper samples. The S-0 from the drill pipe at 17,240 ft (5254 m) has a delta S-34 value similar to that of the sulfur in mud samples. The results appear to indicate that H2S is the source for the S-0. The source of the original H2S is an enigma. We consider several possibilities, among them, formation by biological sulfate reduction, thermal sulfate reduction during burial, a volcanic source, or generation in the deeply buried sediment from thermal disproportionation of pyrite. Here, we evaluate several possible origins based mostly on the properties of the enclosing limestone or shale host rocks, the downhole temperatures, and the stable isotope ratios measured and conclude that pyrite is the most probable source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据