4.5 Article

Evidence for close-range hunting by last interglacial Neanderthals

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 1087-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0596-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lausitzer Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft
  2. Landesamt fur Denkmalpflege und Archaologie Sachsen-Anhalt
  3. Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz
  4. Leiden University
  5. Leids Universiteits Fonds, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [28-548]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GA 683/7-1]
  7. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2_166163, PP00P2_138920]
  9. ETH Zurich Research Grant [ETH-36 14-1]
  10. Kung-Fu-School Baiyin Long Neuwied
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2_138920, PP00P2_166163] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal resources have been part of hominin diets since around 2.5 million years ago, with sharp-edged stone tools facilitating access to carcasses. How exactly hominins acquired animal prey and how hunting strategies varied through time and space is far from clear. The oldest possible hunting weapons known from the archaeological record are 300,000 to 400,000-year-old sharpened wooden staves. These may have been used as throwing and/or close-range thrusting spears, but actual data on how such objects were used are lacking, as unambiguous lesions caused by such weapon-like objects are unknown for most of human prehistory. Here, we report perforations observed on two fallow deer skeletons from Neumark-Nord, Germany, retrieved during excavations of 120,000-year-old lake shore deposits with abundant traces of Neanderthal presence. Detailed studies of the perforations, including micro-computed tomography imaging and ballistic experiments, demonstrate that they resulted from the close-range use of thrusting spears. Such confrontational ways of hunting require close cooperation between participants, and over time may have shaped important aspects of hominin biology and behaviour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据