4.4 Article

Extreme magnification of an individual star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens

期刊

NATURE ASTRONOMY
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 334-342

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0430-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA/STScI [14041, 14199, 14208, 14528, 14872, 14922]
  2. NSF [PHY-1607611, AST-1518052, AST-1602595]
  3. MINECO/FEDER, UE [AYA2015-64508-P]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CSD2010-00064]
  5. Spanish government MINECO [AYA2015-70815-ERC, AYA2015-63650-P]
  6. JSPS KAKENHI [26800093, 15H05892]
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1]
  8. Sloan and Packard Foundation fellowships
  9. PRIN-INAF [1.05.01.94.02]
  10. VILLUM FONDEN Investigator Grant [16599]
  11. [AYA2012-39475-C02-01]
  12. STFC [ST/P000541/1, ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  16. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26800093] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galaxy-cluster gravitational lenses can magnify background galaxies by a total factor of up to similar to 50. Here we report an image of an individual star at redshift z = 1.49 (dubbed MACS J1149 Lensed Star 1) magnified by more than x 2,000. A separate image, detected briefly 0.26 '' from Lensed Star 1, is probably a counterimage of the first star demagnified for multiple years by an object of greater than or similar to 3 solar masses in the cluster. For reasonable assumptions about the lensing system, microlensing fluctuations in the stars' light curves can yield evidence about the mass function of intracluster stars and compact objects, including binary fractions and specific stellar evolution and supernova models. Dark-matter subhaloes or massive compact objects may help to account for the two images' long-term brightness ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据