4.5 Article

A change in the wind? US public views on renewable energy and climate compared

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13705-018-0152-5

关键词

Climate change; Renewable energy; Wind; Solar; Survey; Public opinion

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIP-1230460, 1430260, DUE-1239783]
  2. Carsey School of Public Policy
  3. Sustainability Institute at the University of New Hampshire
  4. Agricultural and Food Research Initiative, US Department of Agriculture [2014-68002-21782, 2010-67023-21705]
  5. New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  6. New Hampshire EPSCoR Safe Beaches and Shellfish project [IIA-1330641]
  7. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  8. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1239783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  10. Directorate For Engineering [1430260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. NIFA [2014-68002-21782, 687305, 580424, 2010-67023-21705] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Renewable energy development is a necessary step toward climate change mitigation, so these topics have often been linked. In US public discourse, however, they have somewhat different profiles-climate change views are tied closely to partisan identity, whereas renewable energy exhibits more cross-cutting appeal, and sometimes more cross-cutting opposition as well. To what extent are such differences reflected in survey data tracking rates of change, respondent characteristics, and local or regional variations in public opinion on renewable energy and climate? Methods: We explore similarities and differences in views of renewable energy and climate change using a unique collection of 18 US national or regional surveys totaling more than 14,000 interviews, conducted between 2011 and 2017. Individual surveys varied in context, content, and goals, but all asked two common energy and climate questions, which yield comparable and strikingly consistent results. Results: Public support for renewable energy appears broader than acceptance of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), especially in a more conservative region. Despite local controversies, support for renewable energy in recent years rose faster than ACC acceptance on two regional surveys. Political divisions remain wide on both topics, but wider regarding climate change-particularly among college-educated respondents. Renewable energy views in counties with proposed or operating wind farms are not systematically different from those in other counties. Conclusions: Overall, these results provide encouragement for promoting renewable energy in terms of its economic benefits, working around some of the political identity-based resistance to climate change mitigation. That approach could be most important in politically conservative regions where such resistance is strong.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据