Acute Treatment of Ruptured Fusiform Posterior Circulation Posterior Cerebral, Superior Cerebellar, and Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms With FRED Flow Diverter: Report of 5 Cases

BACKGROUND: Flow diverter (FD) treatment of ruptured fusiform posterior cerebral artery (PCA), posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), and superior cerebellar artery (SCA) aneurysms are limited to single reports. OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of FD treatment for ruptured fusiform aneurysms of the PCA, SCA, and PICA. METHODS: Five patients with ruptured posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms and treated with a Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED/FRED Jr; Microvention, Tustin, California) stent in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage between 2013 and 2016 were included and reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Two aneurysms located on the PICA, 2 on PCA, and 1 on the SCA. Mean treatment time with FD was 5.8 d (range, 0-11 d) from ictus. The technical success rate was 100%. On admission 2 patients were Hunt and Hess grade 1, 2 patients grade 3, and 1 patient grade 4. At discharge, 4 patients (80%) were independent (modified Ranking Scale (mRS) <= 2) and 1 patient had severe disability (mRS 4). None of the patients had aneurysmal rebleeding. All 5 aneurysms were completely occluded on angiographic follow-up (range, 3-22 mo). One patient had permanent intraprocedural in stent thrombosis and brain infarction. One patient had spontaneous nonaneurysmal intracerebral hemorrhage 1 mo after FD treatment. External ventricular drainage was inserted in 3 patients and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in 2 patients without hemorrhagic complications despite dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSION: FD could be considered as a treatment option for ruptured fusiform aneurysms located on PCA, PICA, or SCA when other treatment options are challenging.