4.2 Article

Comparative analysis of meteorological and hydrological drought over the Pearl River basin in southern China

期刊

HYDROLOGY RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 301-318

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2018.178

关键词

hydrological drought; meteorological drought; Pearl River basin; standardized precipitation index (SPI); standardized runoff index (SRI)

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21617301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530316]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0402805]
  4. Guangzhou water science and technology project [PSZX-XSRQDXS-201601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought is one of the major natural hazards with a possibly devastating impact on the regional environment, agriculture, and water resources. Previous studies have assessed the historic changes in meteorological drought over various regional scales but have rarely considered hydrological drought due to limited hydrological observations. Here, we use long-term (1960-2012) hydrometeorological data to analyze the meteorological and hydrological drought comparatively in the Pearl River basin (PRB) in southern China using the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized runoff index (SRI). The results indicate a strong positive correlation between the SPI and SRI, and the correlation tends to be stronger at the longer timescale. The SPI is reliable to substitute for the SRI to represent the hydrological drought at the long-term scale (e.g., 12 months or longer). Trend analysis reveals a noticeably wetting trend mainly in the eastern regions and a significant drying trend mainly in the western regions and the downstream area of the PRB. The drought frequency is spatially heterogeneous and varies slightly at the interannual scale. Overall, the drought is dominated by noticeable cycles of shorter periodicity (0.75-1.8 years), and periodic cycles in the meteorological drought are mainly responsible for those in the hydrological drought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据