4.5 Article

Varenicline Is a Potent Agonist of the Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine3 Receptor

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.111.185306

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [81925]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS11756]
  3. National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM19375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Varenicline, a widely used and successful smoking cessation agent, acts as a partial agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Here, we explore the effects of varenicline at human and mouse 5-Hydroxytryptamine(3) (5-HT3) receptors. Application of varenicline to human 5-HT3 receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes reveal it is almost a full agonist (R-max = 80%) with an EC50 (5.9 mu M) 3-fold higher than 5-HT. At mouse 5-HT3 receptors varenicline is a partial agonist (R-max = 35%) with an EC50 (18 mu M) 20-fold higher than 5-HT. Displacement of the competitive 5-HT3 receptor antagonist [H-3]granisetron reveals similar IC50 values for varenicline at mouse and human receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, although studies in these cells using a membrane potential-sensitive dye show that again varenicline is a 4- or 35-fold less potent agonist than 5-HT in human and mouse receptors, respectively. Thus the data suggest that the efficacy, but not the affinity, of varenicline is greater at human 5-HT3 receptors compared with mouse. Docking studies provide a possible explanation for this difference, because they suggest distinct orientations of the ligand in the mouse versus human 5-HT3 agonist binding sites. Additional binding selectivity studies in a broad panel of recombinant receptors and enzymes confirmed an interaction with 5-HT3 receptors but revealed no additional interactions of varenicline. Therefore, activation of human 5-HT3 receptors may be responsible for some of the side effects that preclude use of higher doses during varenicline treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据