4.5 Article

Clinical testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2: a worldwide snapshot of technological practices

期刊

NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER NATURE, CO-PUBL CTR EXCELLENCE GENOMIC MED RES
DOI: 10.1038/s41525-018-0046-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute
  2. Intramural Research Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
  3. Florida Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellowship
  5. Canadian Institute for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 began over 20 years ago. With the expiration and overturning of the BRCA patents, limitations on which laboratories could offer commercial testing were lifted. These legal changes occurred approximately the same time as the widespread adoption of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies. Little is known about how these changes impacted laboratory practices for detecting genetic alterations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes. Therefore, we sought to examine current laboratory genetic testing practices for BRCA1/BRCA2. We employed an online survey of 65 questions covering four areas: laboratory characteristics, details on technological methods, variant classification, and client-support information. Eight United States (US) laboratories and 78 non-US laboratories completed the survey. Most laboratories (93%; 80/86) used MPS platforms to identify variants. Laboratories differed widely on: (1) technologies used for large rearrangement detection; (2) criteria for minimum read depths; (3) non-coding regions sequenced; (4) variant classification criteria and approaches; (5) testing volume ranging from 2 to 2.5 x 10(5) tests annually; and (6) deposition of variants into public databases. These data may be useful for national and international agencies to set recommendations for quality standards for BRCA1/BRCA2 clinical testing. These standards could also be applied to testing of other disease genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据