4.7 Article

Identification of Pathogenicity-Associated Loci in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Hospitalized Patients

期刊

MSYSTEMS
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00015-18

关键词

Klebsiella; comparative genomics; intestinal colonization; pathogenesis; psicose; tellurite

资金

  1. Michigan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research [UL1TR000433, UL1TR002240]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01AI125307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite insights gained through experimental models, the set of bacterial genes important for human infection is unclear for many of our most threatening pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae is a leading cause of health care-associated infections (HAIs) and commonly colonizes hospitalized patients, but the factors that determine whether a particular isolate causes disease or remains a colonizer are poorly understood. To identify bacterial genes associated with K. pneumoniae infection, a case-control study was performed comparing infected and asymptomatic colonized patients. Comparative bacterial genomics was combined with a conditional logit model that identified patient factors differentiating cases from controls. This method identified five gene loci associated with infection after adjustment for patient factors, including a psicose sugar utilization locus that was validated as a fitness factor during mouse lung infection. These results indicate that bacterial genome-wide association studies of patients can identify loci associated with HAIs and important in infection models. IMPORTANCE Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common cause of infections in the health care setting. This work supports a paradigm for K. pneumoniae pathogenesis where the accessory genome, composed of genes present in some but not all isolates, influences whether a strain causes infection or asymptomatic colonization, after accounting for patient-level factors. Identification of patients at high risk of infection could allow interventions to prevent or rapidly treat K. pneumoniae infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据